Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Small" Results 601 - 620 of 923
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2009, 5:57 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania 2008). [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
The FDA acknowledges, for instance, that the acceptable intake is set to mark “a small theoretical increase in risk,” and a “highly hypothetical concept that should not be regarded as a realistic indication of the actual risk,” and thus not an actual risk.[9] The corresponding hypothetical or theoretical risk to the acceptable intake level is clearly small when compared with the human’s lifetime probability of developing cancer (which the FDA states is… [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:20 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court granted review of a government case (Sebelius v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am by Kelly
Phoenix Fence Company (Docket Report) District Court E D Pennsylvania: False marking intent to deceive cannot be inferred from knowledge of the limited duration of patents and expiration of marked patents: Hollander v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
Carman, 14-212, a four-time relist, in which the Third Circuit held that a Pennsylvania state police officer violated the plaintiffs’ clearly established Fourth Amendment rights when he failed to begin their police encounter at their front door. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Fred Goldsmith
District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Judges D. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:18 am by admin
They were a big success, and will continue with the Pennsylvania Bar Institute in May and the Pennsylvania Conference of State Trial Judges in July. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:58 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]