Search for: "People v Mix" Results 601 - 620 of 2,538
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm by ernst
Taney’s progenitors went from indentured servant to High Sheriff of Calvert County, whose duties included the “disposal” of the colonial Anglican church’s property of women, including free white women, and their mixed race children, and slaveholding landowner married into the illustrious colonial family of Francis Scott Key.Roger B. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Endorsement by Monroe means something v. different from endorsement by ABG but courts have refused to distinguish those things. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:09 am by James Romoser
” The University of Pennsylvania Law School’s Regulatory Review launches a series of essays on the court’s 2019-20 term, including a piece by Jon Devine and David Henkin on County of Maui v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am by Guest Blogger
  Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am by Kenneth Propp, Peter Swire
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:14 am by Catherine Reach
If you want to see some artificial intelligence in the mix, check out Word Rewrite. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Does it make sense that lawyers elected by lawyers should effectively decide the permitted scope of practice of paralegals with whom they do or would compete for work? [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:00 pm by Guest Author Gary Arlen
  “When violence breaks out at what was a peaceful protest, the people involved may or may not be the same ones. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by Patricia Hughes
However, I often find that time is an elusive concept and for me the “nearness” of Noble v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am by Dennis Crouch
For years Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act blocked registrations that disparaged a group of people. [read post]