Search for: "People v. Dukes"
Results 601 - 620
of 713
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
" Congress also has the power to investigate the workings of the Executive branch simply to determine whether legislative amendments are necessary in order prevent or deter undesirable government practices, and perhaps even for the basic function of facilitating "the American people's ability to reconstruct and come to terms with their history," Nixon v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:03 pm
Such requests arose following the leak of a Supreme Court draft opinion indicating that the Court may strike down Roe v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 9:20 am
- New EDPA case requiring unsuccessful plaintiff to pay as costs part of cost of complying with its ediscovery demands - Link.June 16, 2011: It Should Be An Interesting Couple Of Weeks - Analysis of new Supreme Court Smith v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:43 pm
Victims win.Morehart v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:03 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 8:51 am
However, in the Madey v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:53 am
I would not recommend long tossing on two consecutive daysMourners filled the pews at Saturday’s funeral for Jessica Hernandez at Holy Trinity Catholic Church in Westminster, in the suburbs north of Denver where she grew up Program runs September 2014 June 201585 x 82 Even if it was there, it needed careful detailing As a running back at Duke, he shattered the legendary Ace Parker rushing and scoring records and set the Atlantic Coast Conference single game scoring record of 26 points… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:55 am
Two days later, Justice Scalia appeared in Durham for the United States Tax Court’s Judicial Conference, which was hosted at Duke Law School. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 12:51 pm
So, how many people here want to be wonderful lawprofessors? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Collins, “A Considerable Surgical Operation”: Article III, Equity, and Judge-Made Law in the Federal Courts, Duke Law Journal 60(2):249-343 (2010). [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:05 pm
And so are the people who write and argue over rules. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:59 am
These are the folks who would want to roll back segregation, for whom Loving v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
Nielsen [and] Pars Equality Center v Pompeo (Pars Equality). [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
Nielsen [and] Pars Equality Center v Pompeo (Pars Eqaulity). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 9:07 pm
Johnson, Duke University Sanford School of Public Policy, David I. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 3:02 pm
“Bush v. [read post]
