Search for: "Price v. Price et al" Results 601 - 620 of 1,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2015, 5:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Judge Bea, dissenting, would have sent the case to a jury on the hypothesized IIC about affiliation between MTM and Luminox et al. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
The UK litigation which led to the CJEU ruling in Case C-487/07 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC and Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika Investments Ltd and Starion International Ltd [on which see Katnote here] might be said to be an example of an attempt to change the law succeeding; the assault on Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV and others [2007] EWCA Civ 364 in Virgin Atlantic Airway Ltd v… [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 6:01 am by Barry Sookman
(see SOCAM v. 348803 Alberta Ltd., 1997 CanLII 5389 (FC), 1997 CanLII 5389 and Louis Vutton Malletier S.A. et al. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
West Moberly et. al. v Her Majesty the Queen et. al., SCBC Action No. 05 3802, Victoria Registry, (West Moberly) is a trial being run on a brand new electronic trial platform. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 11:32 am by Steven Cohen
Price et al – United States District Court – District of Colorado – September 24th, 2015) involves a chase, and subsequent killing, of a dog-at-large. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:06 pm by Daily Record Staff
Civil procedure — Declaratory judgment — Need for judicial declaration of parties’ rights On the evening of January 25, 2012, Ronald Krach, while operating his 2004 Dodge Dakota along Belair Road in Baltimore City, struck and killed Joice Price, who was crossing the street in a motorized wheelchair. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The caption of the famous Selden car case which found Henry Ford did not infringe the Selden patent is -- Columbia Motor Car Co. et al. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 7:58 pm by Greene LLP
Sears Holdings Corp et al. made no determination of liability on the part of Kmart. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Airia Brands v Air Canada, 2015 ONSC 5332 [27] The Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants conspired in Canada and throughout the world to fix prices of Airfreight Shipping Services, which is defined to mean airfreight cargo shipping services for shipments to or from Canada (excluding shipments to and from the United States).They emphasize that a global price fixing conspiracy is alleged. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 1:26 pm by Francis Pileggi
  See also more recent decisions in the Khenin case, unrelated to this quote: Utilisave, LLC, et al. v. [read post]