Search for: "Roberts v. Superior Court" Results 601 - 620 of 1,136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2012, 7:59 am by John Summers and Michael Newman
In fact, under the full measure, the Roberts Court reversal rate held to a steady 56% (56.4% over OT2005-2010 v. 57.1% for OT2011.) 2. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 6:35 pm
The District Court for Middle District of Florida considers the issue - often referred to as respondeat superior - in Donaldson v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 12:02 am by Jason Shinn
For example, in Robert Half Int’l, Inc v Van Steenis, 784 F Supp 1263 (ED Mich 1991), where the defendant provided the same services as his former employer, the court limited the geographical scope to a 50-mile radius of the former employer’s offices. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:28 am by David Gans and Adam Winkler
Several of the Justices on the Roberts Court most hostile to race-conscious educational policies, like Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, claim to be originalists. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 6:18 am by Robert Tanha
In Ghanny v. 498326 Ontario Limited, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice was faced with a question that has become all too common in these difficult market conditions. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm by Jim von der Heydt
With school starting up again, I’ve made less progress this month than I hoped in identifying for myself what is so remarkable about Justice Roberts’ forbearance in NFIB v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Possible that you may not have a superior right against these potential defendants anyway. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Nat
  Then the judge referees the jury’s decision followed by the appeals courts. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:20 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
  The Eastern District relied upon Pennsylvania Superior Court case of Vazquez v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Poppy Weston-Davies
On 28 June 2012, the Court dismissed the Applicants’ appeal, and upheld the constitutionality of ACA by five votes to four, with Chief Justice John Roberts’ vote proving decisive. [read post]