Search for: "Rules of Discipline v. Rules"
Results 601 - 620
of 4,417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2014, 5:16 am
” Roe v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 12:37 pm
Op., Camarda, et al., v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:00 am
This can be unfortunate; no particular discipline or methodology is inherently worthy. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 7:15 am
See, e.g., Lugosch v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:50 am
Demanding a letter of apology claimed to impinge on the individual’s constitutionally protected speechWildman v Marshalltown School District, CA 8, 249 F.3d 768The general rule is that a public employee's right to free speech under the First Amendment on the job is protected with respect to speech involving matters the public interest. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:34 pm
” Crist v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 12:08 pm
In Marcin v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 6:28 am
Noting that a violation of a workplace rule, even if caused by a disability, is no defense to discipline, the court agreed. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm
Specifically, in Staub v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:18 am
On November 13, 2014, the Third Appellate District in Earl v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 12:26 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the ruling. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:33 am
According to one federal court of appeals, in Acosta v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:08 am
As the debate continues over the firing of two Toronto firefighters for posting sexist tweets, a new Ontario arbitration ruling has allowed for much more lenient punishment of a teacher who made allegations of homophobia against his principal.In Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 7:04 am
In Steelworkers v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Circuit is Banner Health System v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Tenured teachers and school administrators facing disciplinary action typically have the right to elect the Education Law §3020-a.disciplinary procedure in lieu of a contract disciplinary procedureKilduff v Rochester City Sch. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 8:00 pm
However, in the decision Taylor-Baptiste v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
As a result, the number of access proposals under Rule 14a-8 can be expected to increase and the absence of the discipline created by Rule 14a-11, with which a Rule 14a-8 proposal could not be inconsistent, disappears. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:27 am
A Rule 23 Class Certification Order Must Define Class and its Claims Reiterating its earlier decision in Marcus v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 3:40 pm
Rule No. 1 of 12: The successful cross-examination is well prepared in advance of the exercise. [read post]
