Search for: "Russell v. United States"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2009, 10:34 pm
It's thus fun to see the two of them have at it, as they did in the majority and dissent in the recent criminal case of United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
appeared first on Russell D. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:35 am
United States, the Court limited the availability of enhanced sentences for drug dealers whose customers die or suffer serious injuries. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am
” Leah Litman has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
Region, 558 U.S. 67, 81 (2009) (quoting United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
United States, the court held 8-1 that Congress is required to reimburse health insurance companies for losses created by the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:53 am
California – police authority under Fourth Amendment to search a smartphone taken from an individual at the time of arrest United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
United States 14-1535Issue: (1) Whether prosecutors are permitted to withhold materials covered by Brady v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
United States, in which the Court also heard oral argument yesterday. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am
At Techdirt, Tim Cushing looks at this week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:29 am
Also at The Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr outlines “some of the possible Fourth Amendment rules that the Court might consider” in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
United States and Hill v. [read post]
4 Sep 2021, 6:25 am
Evid. 609 Impeachment For Bias In An Illinois Divorce Hearing Or Trial “The confrontation clause of the sixth amendment of the United States Constitution (U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
United States Issue: Whether, to convict a state official for depriving the public of its right to the defendant’s honest services through the non-disclosure of material information, in violation of the mail-fraud statute (18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 12:21 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:45 pm
United States, 328 U.S. 750, 758 (1946). [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:14 am
United States, a case on next term’s docket, and United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
