Search for: "STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 601 - 620
of 937
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2013, 9:25 am
Tarrant Regional Water District, a Texas agency, claimed it was entitled to acquire water under the Compact from within Oklahoma--and that the Compact therefore preempts certain Oklahoma statutes restricting out-of-state diversions of water. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:37 am
Oklahoma, on the other hand, argued that because the Compact did not explicitly allow diversions by one state in another state, Texas was prohibited from diverting water in Oklahoma. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:28 am
The form, shape, operative rules, etc. may differ from one economy to another, but in the end it is this obligation to the social order that provides economic vitality.The Texas case above is out of the 1st District Court of Appeals, titled Forged Components v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:19 pm
Oklahoma Bar Association v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
Both seek review of decisions of the Oklahoma Supreme Court invalidating state laws under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 11:43 am
That's still territory no state but Texas inhabits. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm
The upstream States (Texas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas), which control the River's flow, were unwilling to release water stored within their own reservoirs for the benefit of any downstream States, like Louisiana. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm
The upstream States (Texas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas), which control the River's flow, were unwilling to release water stored within their own reservoirs for the benefit of any downstream States, like Louisiana. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm
The upstream States (Texas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas), which control the River's flow, were unwilling to release water stored within their own reservoirs for the benefit of any downstream States, like Louisiana. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
Herrmann, United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice 12-1094Issue: Whether the Oklahoma Supreme Court erred in holding – without analysis or discussion – that the Oklahoma law requiring that abortion-inducing drugs be administered according to the protocol described on the drugs’ FDA-approved labels is facially unconstitutional under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:13 pm
Plain English Summary The Red River Compact allocates water between four states, including Texas and Oklahoma. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:02 am
Caldera v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:25 am
Adams v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 6:51 am
Thirty-three outbreak-associated deaths were reported: Colorado (9), Indiana (1), Kansas (3), Louisiana (2), Maryland (1), Missouri (3), Montana (1), Nebraska (1), New Mexico (5), New York (2), Oklahoma (1), Texas (2), and Wyoming (2). [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:49 am
Herrmann, in which the Court is considering whether residents of the Dallas-Fort Worth area have a right to obtain water from across the Oklahoma state line. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:28 am
Tuesday’s oral argument in Tarrant Water District v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:25 am
In University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 5:35 am
Whether a provision of a congressionally approved multi-state compact that is designed to ensure an equal share of water among the contracting states preempts protectionist state laws that obstruct other states from accessing the water to which they are entitled by the compact.News backgrounders: … [read post]
