Search for: "STATE v. KEEN"
Results 601 - 620
of 908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 8:22 pm
New York courts are not particularly keen on extending jurisdiction to allegedly defamatory claims on out-of-state websites. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
, a question raised in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 4:24 am
” Estate of Frankl v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:03 am
Guido v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
Celebrities in ads: federal and state infringement, federal and state dilution, false endorsement, defamation, and right of publicity are all possibilities. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
R (on the application of Amada Bizimana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414 In the wake of France’s apparently unencumbered expulsion of individuals on public interest grounds there has been a fresh outcry from the press about the shackles imposed by the Human Rights Convention on the UK authorities which other signatory states seem to ignore with impunity. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:20 am
The consolidated cases are Gill v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Lewisham relied on Simon Brown J (as he was) in R v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Lewisham relied on Simon Brown J (as he was) in R v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:01 am
If the Court is keen to preserve its subsidiary role, some better indicia for national courts and police would have been of greater assistance. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:09 am
Cir. 2004), Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
Crook, Anderson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:20 am
Mar. 30, 2007) and Keene v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
But the Court returned to a strict interpretation of the ban in 1962, in the case of Enochs v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:51 am
Finally, after the conclusion of the judgment, the Court added a ‘postscript’ expressing concern at the recent re-statement by the ECtHR in X v Latvia (App no 27853/09) that Hague Convention cases demanded an in-depth examination of the entire family situation (as initially expressed, controversially, in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland [2011] 1 FLR 122), and stating its conviction that such an in-depth examination is not required either by the terms of the… [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:23 am
On 7 March 2012, the Supreme Court gave judgment in seven linked cases, now known as W (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:18 pm
In the unpublished case of Probst v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Div. 1996) Keene Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am
Morgan: Possibly…What we know for a fact about Lady Heather Mills McCartney is that in their divorce case Paul McCartney stated as a fact that she had recorded their conversations and given them to the media. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:03 pm
The VCLT rules of treaty interpretation were expressly applied to dispute settlement by the ICJ in the 1994 case of Territorial Dispute (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v Chad), and then by the AB in the 1996 case of United States – Standards of Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline as: ‘the customary rules of interpretation of public international law. [read post]
