Search for: "Scott v. United States" Results 601 - 620 of 3,034
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2020, 2:35 pm by Masha Simonova
Federal sovereign immunity doctrine holds that no one can sue the United States without its consent—sovereign immunity is thus pleaded around by suing officers. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
United States Ron Darling successfully defended himself from a libel suit filed by his former Mets teammate Lenny Dykstra. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:39 pm by Bryn Miller
Rosenthal of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Considerations for Employees In the United States, employers generally are free to prospectively change an employee’s terms and conditions of employment, subject to compliance with contractual obligations and, where applicable, collective-bargaining restrictions. [read post]
18 May 2020, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
United States (1944) is usually cited as well,” Savage said. [read post]
13 May 2020, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
The delay contemplated by the United States would cause the continuation of stays in those proceedings and in related proceedings in district courts. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Philippine The Press Gazette had an article “Filipino government shuts down major news network during pandemic” United States A Pennsylvania hobby company filed a defamation lawsuit accusing Mattel, Rubik’s Brand, Velcro and four other companies of falsely claiming it sold counterfeit products, causing Amazon.com to remove it from its online platform. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  After all, in 1841 we get the first of the Supreme Court’s slavery point-counter points in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
”  Lincoln called for legislation banning slavery in the territories, even though the Supreme Court in Dred Scott v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 1:29 pm by Mark Walsh
God save the United States and this honorable court. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Jackson, in his famous Veto of the bill renewing the charter of the Bank of the United States declared first that “Mere precedent is a dangerous source of authority…. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Just the opposite is true—the release equates Sarkisian's conduct with that of "real estate agents throughout the United States. [read post]