Search for: "Singh v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 854
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For example, the Supreme Court had held that an LPA is maintainable against a judgment given by a single judge under: (a) s. 76(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1940 (National Sewing Thread Co v James Chadwick—a three-judge Bench); (b) s. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Vinita Khanolkar v Pai—a two-judge Bench); (c) s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Sharda Devi v State of Bihar—a three-judge Bench); (d) s. 299 of the Indian Succession Act,… [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
Justice Manmohan Singh of the Delhi High Court, in Arun Jaitley v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:18 am
Supreme Court NML Capital Ltd v Argentina [2011] UKSC 31 (6 July 2011) McDonald, R (on the application of) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2011] UKSC 33 (6 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Dalton v Nottinghamshire County Council [2011] EWCA Civ 776 (06 July 2011) AH v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 787 (06 July 2011) Howell & Ors v Lees- Millais & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 786 (06 July… [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:36 pm
The following are the most important orders given by the Justices Sudershan Reddy and Surinder Singh Nijjar of the Supreme Court in the case of Nandini Sundar v State of Chattisgarh (2011):1. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:28 pm
BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaJustice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice Deepak Varma, in Ramrameshwari Devi & Ors. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm
" Singh v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Land Acquisition Collector & Anr., AIR 2005 SC 3165; and State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 8:52 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 8:52 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:55 am
” Singh v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:34 pm
Chauhan and Justice Swatanter Kumar of the Supreme Court of India, in Vishram Singh Raghubanshi v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:10 pm
Singh. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Rajinder Singh]. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Rajinder Singh]. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm
Such arbitrariness is usually avoided through compliance with what have become known as the “Hardial Singh” principles (taken from the judgment of Woolf J in R v Governor o Durham Prison, ex p Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704) – common law requirements that the detention must only be for the purpose of deportation, and that it must only be for a reasonable period in the circumstances. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:56 am
Sharma v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
Shri Teja Singh, (1975) 1 SCC120. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:44 pm
V. [read post]
15 May 2011, 12:22 am
Justice GangulyThe Supreme Court in Amar Singh v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:12 am
The Supreme Court in Surya Devi Rai v. [read post]
