Search for: "Smith v. State of Ohio" Results 601 - 620 of 880
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm by Stephen Wm. Smith
” As applied to older technologies, the rule contemplates that a tracking device may be a mechanical tool used to track the movement of a tangible object., like the beeper attached to a container of chloroform in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
"Well, state court judges are savvy and powerful people. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
" <> Turlock Irrigation District v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Smith &amp; Nephew Richards, Inc., 763 N.E.2d 160 (Ohio 2002). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:14 pm by cdw
  The Ohio State Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
Hutton, 16-1116, the state of Ohio seeks review of a decision by the U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 6:40 am by cdw
Doug Berman, Ohio State’s sentencing guru, has gathered discussion on the opinion here. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit 2008) (quoting Smith v. [read post]