Search for: "Spells v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
Larkin v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
Larkin v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
Larkin v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
Cuevas v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:17 am
by Dennis Crouch Sabatino Bianco, M.D. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 6:38 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 7:09 am
The case is entitled Itzep et al. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm
Lord Woolf CJ controversially stated: “A public figure is entitled to a private life. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:51 pm
We leave for another day any effort to spell out a comprehensive definition of "testimonial. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 7:07 am
Although some inmates have claimed that the procedure in their states differs in some ways from the Kentucky procedure upheld by the Court in Baze v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
Arguing for state and local officials in Arizona v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 3:37 pm
Thus far, PAGA immunity from FAA preemption has been confirmed, both in California state court (Brown v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:40 am
United States, 37 F.Supp.2d 450 (E.D. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:56 am
In the controversial Texas v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
For example, in Matter of the Board of Education of the Unadilla Valley Central School District, 97 AD3d 1078, the Appellate Division held that a disciplinary settlement agreement that provided that the appointing authority waived its right to bring certain charges against an individual barred it from subsequently bring charges based on the same event[s] or omission[s] while in Shuler v State of New York, 48 AD3d 384, the court sustained a provision in a disciplinary… [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
| Firings will continue until morale improves - Merpel revisits the EPO| Never Too Late 121 [week ending on Sunday 6 November] | Sunday Surprises | Firings will continue until morale improves - Merpel revisits the EPO | Will too much of one and not enough of the other spell bad news for innovation? [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:57 pm
The Washington state case — State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 am
States have not always done a good job of spelling out what is meant by “convenience,” but generally the only exceptions are for when an employee’s work legitimately could not be carried out in the employer’s state. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:09 am
We blogged about this case, Holland v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 11:23 pm
That framing spelled trouble for the challengers. [read post]
