Search for: "State of Maine v. Cross"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
On these facts the cross-reference to Kern was too general, and the anticipation attack failed (neither document alone contained a clear and unambiguous disclosure). [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 10:43 am
NATO’s cyber-defense mandate has evolved over time to update its collective defense commitment under Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty for the era of cyberattacks. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:00 pm
There are all kinds of real or potential conflicts of interest that prevent cross-representation, and thus cross-fertilization of legal thinking. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:52 am
Since Solvay said Honeywell was also infringing its patent right across Europe, in December 2009 it also sought provisional relief in the form of a cross-border prohibition against infringement until a decision had been made in the main proceedings. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:42 am
(Chapter V, articles 44-45) Creation of a European Certificate of Parenthood: children or their legal representatives can request it from the Member State in which the parenthood was established. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 4:21 am
The fair value and fair market value appraisal standards applicable in contested buyout and dissenting shareholder valuations cut across state lines, which is one of the main reasons I occasionally highlight significant court decisions in valuation cases from outside New York. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 1:50 pm
New York v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 7:11 am
While litigating Briscoe v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:35 pm
In Bivens v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:45 am
Aves, in which he defended a slave owner’s right to keep her slave even though she had crossed into a free state. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:51 am
The first is whether it is unconstitutional for a state to require home-care providers, caring for disabled persons, to pay fees to a union to represent their interests before agencies of state government. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that test. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 11:36 am
See R. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
* Finland’s Citizen Copyright Initiative In Doubt: A Sad But Necessary Win For Cross-Border Online Copyright Enforcement? [read post]
3 May 2018, 7:45 am
There was no cross-appeal over the note. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:32 am
Coach, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:22 am
R. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 10:10 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 6:40 am
Mujo v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:02 am
Cross smells (no longer pursued). 10. [read post]
