Search for: "State v David Moree"
Results 601 - 620
of 9,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
” read more [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 7:38 pm
(David Bernstein) When we last encountered the Media Matters blog, its authors reacted to a George Will column on Rehabiltating Lochner by declaring that Lochner v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court in AT&T v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:34 pm
On January 21, in its first decision of this term, Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:40 am
Good for them trying to make the world better.Yet, if it were me, I would not spend my time -- as David Boies and eight or so of his colleagues at Boies Schiller do here -- litigating a lawsuit that says that California should not be permitted to award all of its electoral votes (in a "winner take all" fashion) to whichever presidential candidate obtains the most votes in California in the 2020 election.Call me crazy, but I might be able to find other uses of my time that I… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
State, 332 So.2d 601 (Fla.1976); Walker v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
See Landrigan v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:09 am
United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:11 pm
FTC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Raven v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 8:00 am
But even if a side effect of civil Gideon is that more lawyers have more work, so be it. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 6:24 am
In Papadopoulos v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm
Therefore, it expired on February 3, 2009, long before the plaintiffs brought the action in New York state court in December 2022. [read post]
TTAB Declares Registration Void Because Services Not Rendered Before Filing of Use-Based Application
6 Feb 2014, 3:21 am
Playdom, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Trump v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 1:42 am
Linda Greenhouse's meditation on John Roberts's dissent in the global warming case (Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 8:25 am
” Khoury v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:56 am
He stated that an application for an NPO is not “interim” within the meaning of paragraph 3.1(5) of PD 6B, because the third party from whom information is sought will not be the defendant to the substantive proceedings. [read post]
