Search for: "State v. Cherry"
Results 601 - 620
of 666
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am
”[11] Judge Becker’s opinion for a panel of the Third Circuit provided no details about the cherry picking. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
In Pearson v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 1:33 am
See State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 11:36 am
Gilligan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:57 pm
Clearly, there are some cases, like General Electric v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 5:56 am
The state has always been a platform—an organizer of a set of consensual social norms. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:29 am
Newman v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 pm
Touchstone Television Productions v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Judge Kacsmaryk selectively critiques these procedural steps, second-guesses the judgment calls, and cherry-picks data to paint a picture of a rogue agency bending over backwards to approve mifepristone. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm
., Mean v. [read post]
28 Nov 2024, 5:58 am
First, against the Opposition Division's decision that the (second) intervention of 2 March 2023 (cf. point V. above) was inadmissible. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:50 am
Carney of the Central District of California issued a preliminary injunction in Boland v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm
” Natasha Phillips of Researching Reform writes: Government wants to end Blame Culture – By Blaming Others 11 KBW in Panopticon: Important new privacy judgment: police retention of protestor’s data not an Article 8 infringement The Admin Court (Gross LJ and Irwin J) has handed down judgment this week in Catt v Association of Chief Police Officers and Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 1471 (Admin). [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Emerging areas in Psychology, Data, and Statistical Sciences Gary Marchant, Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law and Ethics, at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, moderated panelists: Xiao-Li Meng, the Whipple V. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
., Sarafin v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
Box 272 Newport, PA 17074 Phone: (717) 567-7125 Alternatives Carlisle 20 East North Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Phone: (717) 960-0140; (717) 960-0149 Fax: (717) 960-0146 Alternatives Lewistown/Service Coordination 3 Monument Square, Suite 100-102 Lewistown, PA 17044 Phone: (717) 247-8291 Fax: (717) 247-8293 Alternatives East/Home Based Services/Capital Connections 401 Division Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Phone: (717) 214-3023 Fax: (717) 214-3027 UCP of Pittsburgh 4638 Centre Avenue… [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:04 pm
`(a) New Chemical Substances and New Uses of Chemical Substances- `(1) NEW CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES- Except as provided in subsection (d), no person may manufacture or process a new chemical substance unless-- `(A) the person submits to the Administrator a notice, in accordance with subsection (c), of the intention of the person to manufacture or process the substance; … [read post]
13 May 2017, 10:22 am
The case, which has gained this recent notoriety is Lois Slemp v. [read post]
