Search for: "State v. Dominic" Results 601 - 620 of 4,481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2022, 9:33 pm by Bona Law PC
It’s the dominant actor in the professional golf market in the United States, with revenues well exceeding $1 billion per year. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: This short essay argues that the congruence and proportionality test of City of Boerne v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thus, for those frustrated with (or openly hostile to) particular elements of the Constitution, such as Article V, brevity has provided a path forward. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 5:01 am by Mark MacCarthy
It accepts that the different policy goal, articulated in the Supreme Court’s Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
One topical example: the leaked draft Supreme Court opinionpurporting to overrule Roe v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”In addition, Thomas argued that allowing federal courts to overturn a state prisoner’s conviction and sentence was an “intru[sion] on state sovereignty … [that] overrides the State’s sovereign power to enforce societal norms through criminal law. [read post]
27 May 2022, 12:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
United States (1957), which was modified in some measure by Miller v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
“HB20 may make using dominant social media platforms so distasteful they become virtually unusable for most of the public. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am by Gabriel Schoenfeld
No single party dominates with an autocrat at its head. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am by David Bilinsky
On May 12, 2022 the British Columbia Court of Appeal issued reasons in the case of: Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. [read post]