Search for: "State v. Public Service Commission"
Results 601 - 620
of 4,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
She discussed the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:50 pm
Nevertheless, the Colorado Civil Rights Commission determined that he had discriminated based on sexual orientation in a place of public accommodation in violation of that state’s Anti-Discrimination Act. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
* Many Local Civil Service Commissions and Civil Service Law §15 Personnel Officers have adopted rules or regulations similar to those set out in 4 NYCCR 5.3 applicable to employees in the Classified Service in their respective jurisdictions.** Mari v Safir, 291 AD2d 298, sets out the general standards applied by the courts in resolving litigation flowing from the appointing authority conducting a disciplinary hearing in absentia. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
* Many Local Civil Service Commissions and Civil Service Law §15 Personnel Officers have adopted rules or regulations similar to those set out in 4 NYCCR 5.3 applicable to employees in the Classified Service in their respective jurisdictions.** Mari v Safir, 291 AD2d 298, sets out the general standards applied by the courts in resolving litigation flowing from the appointing authority conducting a disciplinary hearing in absentia. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Although in People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that a civil service commission cannot mandate a rule of one with respect to appointing an individual from an examination eligible list to a position in the competitive class, the appointing authority itself may elect to be bound by such a rule. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Although in People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that a civil service commission cannot mandate a rule of one with respect to appointing an individual from an examination eligible list to a position in the competitive class, the appointing authority itself may elect to be bound by such a rule. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 4:10 am
The Rules of the State Civil Service Commission specifically provide that "[e]xcept as otherwise specified in any particular rule, these rules shall apply to positions and employments in the classified service of the State and public authorities, public benefit corporations and other agencies for which the Civil Service Law is administered by the State Department of Civil Service. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 8:40 am
The first is that the condemning authority is a private electric company operating under the authorization of the Texas Public Utility Commission. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Hearing officer's applying an incorrect standard in making his or her determination requires the remanding of the matter for a new hearingMcGowan v New York State & Local Police & Fire Retirement Sys., 2017 NY Slip Op 01751, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentJames K. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:06 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
One is Ingersoll v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 11:08 am
Exelon Services, Inc.] and [Walters v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
I chose the case of the day, Starski v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 10:36 pm
Apple, Pepper v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 2:38 pm
With national legislators in EU Member States trying to find the right implementation strategy at the domestic level and the European Commission working on a new architecture for internet service provider liability in the Digital Services Act (‘DSA’), the debate has reached a new peak. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:41 am
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:41 am
No. 6 of Towns of Islip & Smithtown v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 35 NY2d 371, the Appellate Division rejected this defense as well, commenting that “Contrary to the defendants' contention, an action commenced pursuant to Civil Service Law §102(2) is an action ‘to vindicate a public interest’ to which the notice of claim requirement in Education Law §3813(1) does not apply. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:24 am
The suit, styled Powder River Basin Resource Council, et al. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am
[The CJEU gave judgment in Uber Spain on 20 December 2017, holding that the service was a transport service and not an information society service.] [read post]
