Search for: "State v. Servantes"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Ross v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:51 am
In Estate of Thibodeau v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:07 am
V. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 4:30 pm
The court acknowledged conflicting decisions on the point but quoted the Ninth Circuit’s decision in UMG Recordings v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 6:24 pm
The principle was clearly stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Machtinger v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
If §75 charges of misconduct "would, if proved in a court of law constitute a crime,” the 18-month statute of limitations for bringing such charges does not applyHanlon v New York State Police, 2015 NY Slip Op 08315, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentChristian Hanlon was served with disciplinary charges pursuant to Civil Service Law §75. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
They are her servants. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:31 am
Explaining that the Darden test applied to Title VII cases, while the Enterprise test did not, the appeals court found that the sole question before it was whether the common law of agency would recognize a master-servant relationship. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 12:20 am
Heinisch v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 12:25 am
Rex v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:11 am
As in Hylton v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
”*In contrast, a public employer may not abolish a position as a subterfuge to avoid statutory or contractual protection afforded civil servants before they are discharged. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:51 am
On August 27, revisiting its joint employer standard, a divided five-member panel of the NLRB reaffirmed the standard articulated by the Third Circuit’s 1981 decision in NLRB v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:29 am
It is why the line of cases coming out of Sherbert v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 12:09 am
(I remind you that you have nothing but Justice Kennedy’s word for it that the Constitution says anything about the definition of “marriage”, or about the Supreme Court’s authority to change local State laws that have always defined what that term meant.)She is not free, under the Constitution, to impose HER religious views, while working as a CIVIL servant, to deny issuing a government license/contract to anyone, based on her religious beliefs.You have the… [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
This point includes relevant text of a recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Eweida and Others v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
Brown v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 6:29 am
The opinion is styled, Doe #1, Doe #2 and Doe #3, v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm
The event will include a keynote address from Judge Jimmie V. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 11:47 am
By Jason Rantanen Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
