Search for: "State v. Singh" Results 601 - 620 of 848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 2:56 am
In that regard reliance may be placed on a Full Bench judgment of this Court rendered in the case of State of Punjab v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:58 pm
"The Court added that the fact that the litigation is mainly fought in India in respect of a temporary injunction is a very unsatisfactory state of affairs. [read post]
The attempt to justify the constitutionality of Section 124-A by relying on the judgement made in Kedar Nath Singh v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:40 pm by Adam Wagner
The most notorious example has been McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd, an unfair dismissal claim brought by a relationship counselor who as a result of his Christian beliefs refused to promote gay sex. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:10 am
In the 1969 Presidential election when Indira Gandhi gave the call for conscience vote, resulting in the election of V.V.Giri, the Supreme Court held in Shiv Kripal Singh v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
The court stated that Mr. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 8:53 am by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
  Singh Estate v Bajrangie-Singh (1999), 129 ETR (2d) 302, 1999 CarswellOnt 2230 (Ont Sup Ct J). [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:04 am by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
  Singh Estate v Bajrangie-Singh (1999), 129 ETR (2d) 302, 1999 CarswellOnt 2230 (Ont Sup Ct J). [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 4 November 2011, the Administrative Court (Moses LJ and Singh J) dismissed the application for permission in the judicial review case of R (Decoulos) v Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am by INFORRM
  It appeared to remain the law that where a conclusion was “objectively verifiable” it was not defensible as comment (although reconciling Hamilton v Clifford [2004] EWHC 1542 (QB) and British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350 is not straight forward on this). [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Shamnad Basheer
A true copy of excerpts from the decision in Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
Finally, Asim Singh updates us on the latest French site-blocking litigation on the 1709 Blog.The thoughtful and creative John Walker, a regular correspondent on the 1709 Blog on matters of interest to artists, not least of which is the rights and wrongs of resale royalty rights, has (as he modestly states) written something on "fair use" re scanning library books on Club Troppo ("the suppository of all centrist wisdom since 2002", with the lovely armadillo logo on the right).… [read post]