Search for: "State v. Urban"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2008, 7:42 pm
Department of Housing and Urban Development ......... [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
In MCAD v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
Currently, Democrats in the United States are mostly clustered in urban areas, while Republicans tend to inhabit more suburban and rural areas. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
Luis V. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:51 am
Yet in Francis v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:49 pm
Dollar Store/Urban Decay. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 3:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 8:01 am
As stated above, the regulations explicitly state that area sources are exempt from Title V permitting requirements, unless otherwise required by law. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
In Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Kershaw, Charles Warren Center, Harvard University, “The Ascendance ofthe Neoliberal Political Order: A Triumph of Interests, Not Ideology”Reuel Schiller, University of California, Hastings College of the Law, “Beyond NewDeal Regulation: Neo-Liberalism and the Modern Administrative State”Commentator and Chair: Mary Furner, UCSBPlenary: Race in the Configuration and Reconfiguration of the New Deal Order Matt Garcia, Arizona State University, “The… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
The book describes the litigation in Kelo v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:04 am
The Supreme Court considers the judgment in Hall & Co Ltd v Shoreham-by-Sea Urban District Council[1964] 1 WLR 240, which considered the circumvention of the relevant compulsory purchase regime by a purported planning condition. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:06 am
The case in question was Evenwel v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:09 am
This is good news for workers who live in urban areas in Southern California like Los Angeles. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:15 am
The court’s entire decision can be found at Edwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 7:35 am
Caperton v. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 1:14 am
On Wednesday, two Ericsson v. [read post]
25 May 2013, 6:59 am
United States v. [read post]
