Search for: "U. S. v. Court" Results 601 - 620 of 10,792
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2015, 8:30 pm
Supreme Court denied the defendant’s petition for a writ of certiorari in Brown, et al. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 1:33 pm
We assume, for argument’s sake, that the precedent is correct in that context (a matter this Court itself has not decided and does not now decide). [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:15 am by Jeffrey I.D. Lewis
On the first Monday of October—the first day of arguments in the Supreme Courts 2019 term—the Court will hear argument in Peter v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
At the Supreme Courts first oral argument of its new term, “the courts most liberal justices joined in criticizing the idea the Austrian national railway could be liable simply for allowing its tickets to be sold in the U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:10 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  We’ve posted ACCA’s unpublished opinion, which isn’t yet on the courts website, here. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Holland & Knight LLC v Walsam 316, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 33748(U) October 17, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 654470/2022Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
No. 11-0221-cv (2d Cir. 2012), presents one of the few Court of Appeals’ analyzes of the reach of the Supreme Courts extraterritorial decision in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Citing Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, the court explained that “[t]o accept [the excuses] would amount to second-guessing the determination that [Rabenswaay’s] repeated failure to timely complete the IEPs reflected a pedagogical deficiency that merited the U-rating. [read post]