Search for: "U.S. v. (under Seal)" Results 601 - 620 of 1,394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2017, 7:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
The Seal Requirement Under the FCA, private citizens can file what is known as a qui tam action under the FCA on behalf of the U.S. government. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 7:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
The Seal Requirement Under the FCA, private citizens can file what is known as a qui tam action under the FCA on behalf of the U.S. government. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:35 am by Jonathan Bailey
” A 2010 Fourth Circuit case, Universal Furniture International, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
King, who unearthed FBI files that were under seal for sixty years, has done an outstanding job in telling this story which manages to be heart-breaking, inspiring, infuriating, and admirable all at once. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:22 pm by Robert B. Milligan
While the circuit court split continues to widen regarding the interpretation of unauthorized access under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the recent decision in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:22 pm by Robert B. Milligan
While the circuit court split continues to widen regarding the interpretation of unauthorized access under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the recent decision in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 9:28 am by Quinta Jurecic
Benjamin Wittes alerted us that a federal judge ordered the SSCI report to be preserved under seal with the D.C. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:00 am by Russell Spivak, Adam Aliano
The Court analyzed the law under the framework of intermediate scrutiny established under Craig v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:28 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
Roberts, held this matter in abeyance under the abstention doctrine articulated in Schlesinger v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg BNA, Patrick Gregory lists five things to know about Judge Diane Sykes of the U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
Rigsby, in which the court ruled that a violation of the seal requirement does not mandate dismissal of a suit brought under the False Claims Act. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
Rigsby, in which the court ruled that a violation of the seal requirement does not mandate dismissal of a suit brought under the False Claims Act, maintaining that although the “Court, in its concluding remarks, sought to address the concerns … that failure to require mandatory dismissal for violation of the seal would encourage relators to harass defendants into settling claims by leaking embarrassing stories to the news media,” “given the extreme… [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
Rigsby, in which the court ruled that a violation of the seal requirement does not mandate dismissal of a suit brought under the False Claims Act, concluding that the “Supreme Court has placed responsibility for penalizing seal violations under the False Claims Act (FCA) squarely where it belongs: At the ‘sound discretion’ of the district court whose order was broken. [read post]