Search for: "US v. Taylor"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" Observing that "the public policy exception to the arbitrability of public sector labor disputes is narrow," the Court of Appeals sustained the arbitration award, observing that the promotional practices of a public employer constitute a term or condition of employment that may be determined through collective bargaining under the Taylor Law.In contrast, however, determining the seniority rights in some situations are statutory such as determining an employee's… [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Pub. [read post]
10 May 2007, 5:31 am
Taylor v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:06 pm
It is possible to sue in reliance on historic or residual goodwill in a brand that has not been used for some years (cf Ad-Lib Club v Granville [1972] RPC 673). [read post]
13 Oct 2012, 7:16 am
Newsom v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:40 am
An arbitrator issued the decision after a disciplinary grievance hearing conducted in accordance with the provisions of a Taylor Law agreement. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 1:45 pm
Matthew Nied and Taylor Little - In TELUS Corporation v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:55 am
Taylor, supra. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 2:42 pm
Based on server logs, Fidlar concluded that LPS was using a web-harvester instead of the Laredo client to obtain records.Fidlar Technologies v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 2:37 pm
Burwell v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
In the case of the Hatice Cengiz v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Taylor Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids 08a0725n.06 USA v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
Before we get into the legal issues, a little more background on what happened here might be useful. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
The Appellate Division ruled that Hankin attempted to use the subpoena duces tecum improperly and such a subpoena "may not be used for purposes of discovery or to ascertain the existence of evidence" [Board of Educ. of City of New York v Hankins 294 A.D.2d 360].Sometimes an individual served with disciplinary charges will demand "a bill of particulars" requiring the appointing authority to set out the charges and specifications filed against the… [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 9:30 am
And in its 2014 Alice Corp. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 2:44 am
"]Vineyard 29, LLC v. 29 Wine Company, LLC, Opposition No. 91227774 (October 29, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jyll Taylor) [Opposition to registration of HIGHWAY 29 for wine in view of the registered mark 29 for wine. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in McCord v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 2:42 am
., invalidity) complaints;preliminary injunctions in light of the Munich I Regional Court's preliminary reference to the European Court of Justice; andaccess to standard-essential patent (SEP) injunctions post-Sisvel v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
California Bound: Slavery on the New Frontier, an exhibit curated by Tyree Boyd-Pates and Taylor Bythewood-Porter, is at the California African American Museum in Los Angeles through April 28.I'm grateful to Virginia Law's Aditya Bamzai for posting his amicus brief in PDR Network et al. v. [read post]
