Search for: "United States v. Flood" Results 601 - 620 of 1,137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm by Margaret Taylor
United States as permitting “Congress to inquire into and publicize corruption, maladministration or inefficiency in agencies of the Government. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 4:54 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States Supreme Court held that all citizens are charged with the knowledge of the law regarding federal insurance programs, like the NFIP. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 6:06 am by Clara Apt
Climate Change and the Courts Greenhouse Gaslighting: Deceptive Moderation and West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 8:32 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the United States, Tribal nations have a long history of responsible land stewardship, with environmental conservation and respect for the world’s biodiversity being an inextricable piece of Tribal customs, traditions, and knowledge. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The company filed a petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 5:59 pm
In the United States, we are likely to see more severe flooding, more frequent droughts, and a rush to secure legal rights to water supplies. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:27 am
United States Fish & Wildlife Service, 378 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2004), we conclude that the jeopardy regulation requires NMFS to consider both recovery and survival impacts... [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 1:06 pm by Bill Ward
The United States Constitution, Article 5 states, “No person shall be...deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
The United States appeals from the district court's denial of its motion for summary judgment and grant of the State of Ohio's and Buckingham Coal Company's motions for summary judgment in this action challenging Ohio's right to lease Buckingham the right to mine coal lying beneath land acquired for a flood control project. [read post]