Search for: "United States v. Fox"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2021, 11:12 am
In addition to the state and federal courts of D.C., VA, and M.D., he is a member of the Federal Courts in Puerto Rico, Colorado, and Texas, as well as the Court of Federal Claims, the Federal Circuit, where he has recently argued and won three appellate matters, the Veteran’s Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court, where he was lead counsel on a False Claims Act case (See United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:10 am
Neff is a partner with the law firm of Fox Rothschild LLP. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 10:13 am
This was a public appearance in his capacity as President of the United States, after all. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm
They have been “playing” the United States for years. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm
Instead, we are talking about a religious test.By the way, that is unconstitutional:“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the… [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant of impeding the administration of the tax code, the government must prove that the defendant knew of or could have foreseen a tax-related proceeding. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:36 am
He said the United States did not use "brute force" and the memos prove detainees weren't tortured. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
Chief Justice John Marshall famously stated "[t]he government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
United States Restructured and Revitalized: A Proposal to Amend Federal Evidence Rule 702,” 26 Jurimetrics J. 249, 256 (1986)). [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:02 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am
United States, in which the court affirmed a lower-court judgment finding that Congress properly delegated authority to the U.S. attorney general to apply the registration requirements of a sex-offender-registration law, “may presage a coming sea change in judicial review of agency rules implementing broad Congressional directives. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
United States (SB1070) FCC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
And amid all of that activity, the court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:40 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 5:11 pm
Circuit claiming that the "open platforms for devices and applications" portions of the auction rules (the "no locking, no blocking" rules): exceed the Commission's authority under the Communications Actviolate the United States Constitutionviolate the Administrative Procedure Actand are arbitrary, capricious, unsupported by substantial evidence and otherwise contrary to law.Just as a guess, I'd say that VZ Wireless intends to claim that, as in… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:33 am
However in the precedent case of United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:59 am
Supreme Court Insider: Our Supreme Court newsletter on Wednesday featured: an interview with Montana’s attorney general on the case from his state that could get the Court to reconsider Citizens United; a report on Paul Clement’s not-great day arguing before the Court; and a profile of Drinker Biddle’s Lawrence Fox, who got the Court’s attention with a powerful legal ethics brief in Maples v. [read post]
