Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 601 - 620 of 11,954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 22-800Issue: Whether the 16th Amendment authorizes Congress to tax unrealized sums without apportionment among the states. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 10:14 am by Unknown
Yesterday the United States Tax Court issued an opinion in Sanders v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:20 am by Terry Hart
But many have noted that since Campbell, transformative use has caused fair use to grow overly expansive and unbalanced.4See, e.g., Jane Ginsburg, Fair Use in the United States: Transformed, Deformed, Reformed? [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
In fact, the State of Maryland allowed someone to sue on its behalf pursuant to state law in the landmark case of McCullough v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 2:31 am by Becky L. Kalas, FordHarrison
The writers are setting the stage, but there’s little doubt employers in a variety of industries will be addressing the part AI will play. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Once one has learned a little about federalism, it becomes difficult to argue that state resistance has been Bad In General across all of American history. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
If we assume that utility functions yield values expressed in units of utility or utiles, then individual's utility function might score state of affairs P at 80 utiles and state of affairs Q at 120 utiles. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The ET had erred in its approach because it had failed to engage with the question identified in Eweida and Ors v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8; had it done so, it would have concluded that there was a close or direct nexus between her Facebook posts and her protected beliefs. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 5:10 am by Cyberleagle
As often and as loudly as this is repeated, it has gained little legislative traction. [read post]