Search for: "United States v. Stanford"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2015, 5:41 pm
Or a manufacturer of cars, you can sell cars in the United States, but every third car you have to give to the United States? [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:58 pm
” The Court won’t be settling that issue in the case of Horne v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
The Northern District of CA dismissed the class action suit in September 2014 on the theory that the case did not have sufficient ties to the United States to overcome the presumption against extraterritoriality under the test set forth by the Supreme Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:48 am
But it took nearly a century and a half of United States history for the first female federal judges to break the judicial glass ceiling. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:19 am
United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 11:05 am
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:58 am
” MLive covered the event and posted a short video of Justice Ginsburg discussing the Court’s 1996 decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:03 am
ObamaKlayman v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 10:00 am
It will take place at Stanford Law School, in Stanford, California.In order to be considered for the 2015 International Junior Faculty Forum, authors must meet the following criteria:Citizen of a country other than the United StatesCurrent academic institution is outside of the United States and not a present student in the United StatesHave held a faculty position or the equivalent, including positions comparable to junior faculty positions in… [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:13 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 8:45 am
In the United States, unlike in Germany, placing articles in top-tier journals constitutes a necessary step on the long and winding road to tenure. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Michela Giorcelli and Petra Moser, Stanford University economists, studied Italian opera from the late 1700s through 1900 and found that after Napoleon invaded Italy — bringing with him French copyright laws — those copyright laws were associated with both more and higher-quality operas. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:46 am
Petra Moser (Stanford Dep’t of Economics)Topic: Measuring the Effects of Patents on Private Incentives, Commenting on: James Bessen et al., The Costs and Benefits of United States Patents (2014)Estimating private costs and benefits of US patents owned by publicly held firms. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:18 am
This decision overruled Stanford v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:18 am
This decision overruled Stanford v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:37 am
Here's the abstract from the paper:The Supreme Court’s pronouncements in Brady v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:12 am
Prior to Myriad, the US Supreme Court held in Mayo v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
And the United States Supreme Court and courts of other states have treated the right as extending beyond firearms. [read post]
