Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of"
Results 601 - 620
of 942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
” W. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
Div. 2002); G & W, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
It is also undisputed that the merger agreement lacked any provision excluding pre merger attorney-client communications from the assets of Plimus that were transferred to the Buyer as a matter of law in the merger, a [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:13 am
The district court granted Cisco's request. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 9:18 pm
Mentalix’s accused software can be used with fingerprint scanners sold by other companies, including Cross Match. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:52 am
Because the SCOV is reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we’re in same-standard-as-the-trial-court territory: if there’s no genuine dispute of material fact, and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, then summary judgment is proper—in other words, not a lot of deference to the trial court. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 4:45 pm
It also runs the IP Osgoode Innovation Clinic, a clinic that works with start-up companies to help them secure and protect their IP en route to commercial success. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 8:22 am
The company’s owner told her that “in his experience, ‘[w]omen’s priorities shift when they become mothers’” and that she should consider that. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:57 pm
The Supreme Court has cautioned that “[a]n injunction is a drastic and extraordinary remedy, which should not be granted as a matter of course. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 7:59 pm
Cir. 1994) (“[d]etermining ‘inventorship’ is nothing more than de- termining who conceived the subject matter at issue”). [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 11:54 am
OWW asserted that: “[i]t is well settled that issues of c [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 1:31 pm
It’s basically the idea that when an insurance company pays their insured and someone else is at fault, the insurance company has a right to collect from the at-fault person. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:08 am
Oct. 28, 2013) (“Abbott”), stay granted in part on other grounds, ___ F.3d ___, 2013 WL 5857853 (5th Cir. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Anonymous and company couldn’t have done it better themselves. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
DRAFT Statement for HPSCI As an initial matter, two caveats are in order. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:50 am
A federal district court in New Jersey granted a technology staffing company’s motion to set aside a DOL Administrative Review Board determination that the company willfully failed to comply with H-1B notice-posting requirements at required work sites (CAMO Technologies, Inc v Solis, October 18, 2013, Martini, W). [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 8:16 am
[W]hat did she expect? [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
T. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:16 pm
Therefore, Designer Skin’s agency theory fails as a matter of law. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
”The simple fact of the matter is that, while a drug (or device) company supposedly might be able to fool some of the medical community some of the time, it’s simply not possible to fool all of the medical community all of the time. [read post]
