Search for: "JOHN DOE-1" Results 6181 - 6200 of 14,305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 11:55 am by Matthew O'Connor
There has been a revival of “the fundamentals of valuation and critical due diligence for mergers & acquisitions (M&A), capital markets, and investment opportunities” post mortgage crisis and credit crunch.[1] There are varying valuations theories, which are used in different scenarios. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm by admin
Ioannidis “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False,” 1 PLoS Med 8 (2005). [3] Joseph P. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Stephens County, No. 07-10729 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action for allegedly causing or failing to prevent the jailhouse death of plaintiff's son, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) denial of leave to amend the complaint to name five of the "John Doe" defendants was proper since the statute of limitations rendered amendment futile; and 2) there was insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude that sheriff personally caused the… [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
A: On July 13, 1836, US Patent Number 1 was issued to John Ruggles for traction wheels. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  The report, however, does not find that these unnamed persons had legal responsibility. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
A breach of s. 530(3) is an error of law warranting appellate intervention under s. 686(1)(a). [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm by Samuel Bray
I'll leave the more detailed analysis of 1 and 2 to John Harrison, whose work on these questions is superb (see here and here and here). [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Johns and Melva Enos (forthcoming) Petitioner’s reply   Hardy v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:25 am by Susan Brenner
Ohio Revised Code § 2317.02(B)(1)(d) says that the physician-patient privilege “does not apply” in any criminal action against a physician or dentist. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am by Randy Barnett
(I’ve blogged about some of these points before.) 1      A jurisprudence of “wrong the day it was decided. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 2:03 pm by Amy Howe
But whatever the court does, it is likely to act quickly, to give the state enough time to prepare for the 2024 elections. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Mylan”), Medicines filed suit in the United StatesDistrict Court for the Northern District of Illinois allegingthat Mylan’s ANDA infringed claims 1–3, 7–10, and 17 ofthe ’727 patent, and claims 1–3 and 7–11 of the ’343patent. [read post]