Search for: "Little v. Little" Results 6181 - 6200 of 39,473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm by Dan Markel
However, as we were talking in class yesterday, I thought the liberty takings argument had more force in the context of the post-conviction post-punishment detainment of  folks, e.g., the sexually violent  predator types in Kansas v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 10:23 am
An interesting little puzzle: if a public entity and a "gad-fly" advocacy group enter into a settlement agreement whereby the gad-fly will not address any further challenges to the public entity's conduct that he originally challenged through litigation, will a later complaint by the public entity for the breach of that settlement agreement against the gad-fly be precluded by the Minnesota anti-SLAPP statute? [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:12 am by Kevin LaCroix
I hope you saved the little paper umbrella from the fruity drink that you and your spouse shared on the terrace of the outdoor café and that you are still finding sand in your tennis shoes. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Cordell Parvin
Because we tend to think in the present, let me give you a little history. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 11:40 pm by Lisa Stam
While we like to help businesses set up their employment relationships from day one, more often than not we come in to help a little later. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 1:31 pm by Brian Turetsky
  While conceding that certain unlawful fee practices may be covered by existing rules and statutes, the FTC explains in the Notice that its ability to seek consumer redress is limited or unavailable in many instances in light of the Supreme Court’s holding in AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 8:43 am by Sheppard Mullin
Fortunately, the Delaware Chancery Court recently issued a decision, entitled Edgewater Growth Capital Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 1:12 pm by Buce
There's little by way of dramatic conflict; just a series of something very close to tableaux. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:22 am by Kathy Kapusta
Supreme Court, in Int’l Union v Johnson, has held that gender discrimination claims based on childbearing capacity fall under Title VII’s protection. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 3:31 pm
Nifong may be immune, thanks to Imbler v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:05 am by Lyle Denniston
Feldman thus became the first by a federal court to reject a constitutional challenge since the Justices’ decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 8:48 am by Benjamin Wittes
Recall that in Parhat v. [read post]