Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 6181 - 6200 of 42,214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2016, 11:21 am by Amy Howe
The Court seemed to regard this as a matter of correlation, rather than causation, though. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 7:08 am
In short, a DWI/DUI attorney must make the State alert to their discovery responsibilities regarding the videotape evidence and the exculpatory value of that evidence at an early juncture in accordance with the rule set forth in Holup, supra, 253 N.J.Super. 320. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 4:04 am by Russell Knight
A divorce case unwinds the matters of two people who were together for years. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 3:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It is unclear, under the rule enunciated that such statements could be admitted into evidence for impeachment purposes. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 3:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It is unclear, under the rule enunciated that such statements could be admitted into evidence for impeachment purposes. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 12:08 pm
Relying on Pioneer, Belaire-West and Puerto, the appellate court held that the trial court erred in permitting plaintiff discovery of contact information for putative class members, see id., at 11-13, and that this erroneous ruling meant that plaintiff “lacked the means to develop evidence capable of supporting his motion for class certification,” id., at 13. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:57 am by Daniel Shaviro
The exposure of such previously secret rulings in the Lux Leaks scandal were therefore at least arguably bad news for Luxembourg, whereas for Lux rulings covering purely internal matters there would be no reason for presuming ex ante that secrecy was nationally beneficial. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 11:15 am by Eugene Volokh
["All know: talk is cheap; Liars can claim anything; No evidence?! [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 4:40 am by Russell Knight
Witmer, 543 NE 2d 1304 – Ill: Supreme Court 1989 Previous evidence taken and ruled upon in an Illinois divorce case shall not serve as an undisputed fact which warrants a summary judgment. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 5:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Bayard de Volo’s … opinions do not explain evidence which will be before the jury that it otherwise could not understand, such as drug paraphernalia, gang practices, or some technical matter. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:57 am by admin
In Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(c), which provides that examination and cross-examination will “proceed as permitted at the trial under…the Federal Rules of Evidence,” the language “except Rules 103 and 615? [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 11:29 am by The Law Office of James K. Meehan
While the courts defer to the ALJ as to issues such as credibility and the resolution of conflicts in the evidence, the ALJ cannot ignore evidence or weigh matters in the purview of experts. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 6:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Because the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence and is not contrary to law, we affirm.(...)The Board concluded from the evidence submitted that there was no interference-in-fact. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 6:53 am by Joy Waltemath
The defendants filed motions for judgment as a matter of law and the lower court affirmed the jury verdict. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:35 am
" Same rule would seem to apply for which party must prove that the offending vehicle weighed more than 6,500 pounds. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 6:24 am by Kelly McClure
  The court based this conclusion on the principle that the paramount concern in a custody matter is the child’s best interest, which must be proven by evidence. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 1:16 pm by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
The Appeals Court disagreed and ultimately affirmed the lower court judge’s decision to rule the case untriable under res judicata. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That did not prevent the trial judge from entertaining defendants' motions for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50.The false arrest and excessive force claims were dismissed under Rule 50. [read post]