Search for: "May v. May"
Results 6181 - 6200
of 182,856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2012, 6:36 am
An astute and clearly knowledgeable reader passed along the point that the recent Sixth Circuit decision in Pfeil v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:15 am
In People v Franklin, No. 142323, the Court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Rosario v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 11:56 am
Even though the NLRA and the FLSA embody different tests for identifying employer-employee relationships (common law v. eceonomic realities), the Wage and Hour Division will undoubtedly cite the NLRB’s expanded view of who can be a “joint employer” to support the Wage and Hour Division’s expected further efforts to expand the range of parties that may be found responsible for wage and hour violations. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 10:56 am
See OSI Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 9:18 am
See Whittell v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
Feb. 1, 2016, By Garrett Brnger, KSAT ABC-12 More Blog Entries: Cleveland v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:17 pm
The Courts came to the same conclusion in Girling v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:08 pm
Section 46PO(4) of the AHRC Act provides that if the Court is satisfied there has been unlawful discrimination by any respondent, the Court may make such orders as it thinks fit. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 9:42 am
This was in essence what the Court of Justice (CJEU) had to decide on reference from the Finnish Supreme Court in C-264/21 of July 07, 2022, Keskinäinen Vakuutusyhtiö Fennia (Fennia) v Koninklijke Philips NV, and the answer was yes, you can. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 3:16 am
Read the full story here India reverts abandoned trademark applications to original status To comply with the 13 April 2023 decision of the High Court of Delhi, India, in Intellectual Property Attorneys Association (IPAA) & Anr. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:52 pm
Section 7 and protected speech In Eastex, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:17 pm
The Courts came to the same conclusion in Girling v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
In Chewy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court decided Sackett v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court decided Sackett v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Phase 2 – “After careful consideration, the Bureau may release another draft update of the IPEGs for further public consultation as part of phase two, or it may decide to finalize the IPEGs according to the changes it made in phase one. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:48 am
The decision of the Tenth Circuit (Burwell v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:48 am
The decision of the Tenth Circuit (Burwell v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 11:52 am
Qualcomm is way bigger than Apple v. [read post]
