Search for: "State v. Keis" Results 6181 - 6200 of 22,499
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2020, 3:42 pm by Elena Chachko
Attorney General; HCJ 11298/03 Movement for Quality Government in Israel v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:29 pm by Enrico Bonadio
The impact of Huawei v ZTE Since the seminal 2015 CJEU case of Huawei v ZTE (the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (Case C-170/13 Huawei Technologies, EU:C:2015:477)) the importance of a harmonised approach to FRAND across EU member states has become obvious. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:18 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Synopsis: The second key trend from our 16th Annual Workplace Class Action Litigation Report involves rulings by the U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 4:28 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
“While this unanimous decision perhaps comes as no surprise to regular bankruptcy practitioners, it is a key practice pointer for attorneys who only occasionally have to foray into bankruptcy court. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 1:46 pm by Keith E. Whittington
Virginia has now become the 38th state to vote to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment, which arguably crosses the ratification threshold set out in Article V of the U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
Key to this debate over witnesses is the distinction between law and fact. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
The majority of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada Post Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
New Relists Patterson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:34 am by Marty Lederman
  And yesterday, the States and the House filed their reply briefs on the motion to expedite. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am by Hannah Kris, William Ford
The RSVP deadline is Jan. 16, not Jan.14 as stated in the flier. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 10:31 pm by Giesela Ruehl
This can hardly be said to  constitute a ‘reasonable alternative means’ for Supreme would have to raise claims before the courts of multiple states in question creating a risk of parallel and inconsistent judgments; the claims against a key defendant (the NATO entities) remain unaddressed; and the RFWG comprises representatives of the defendant completely lacking in objective independence. [read post]