Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 6181 - 6200 of 57,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
  Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms ([2000] 2 AC 115) that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to… [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm by Venkat
The issue has come up in the employment context as well, where one court said that shoulder-surfing over a co-worker's shoulder could state a privacy claim (Ehling v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In Lamot v Gondek, 163 AD2d 678, the court said it had “unambiguously established” that such a remedy includes the consideration of "pension rights [that are] established with reasonable certainty" and ruled that the Commissioner's order that Employee “take steps to involve the Office of the State Comptroller and the New York State and Local Retirement System — presumably to have them provide an actual pension — was an… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A public educational institution is not an “education corporation” within the meaning of New York State’s Human Rights LawGarcia v City Univ. of N.Y., 2016 NY Slip Op 01271, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSupreme Court dismissed Minerva Garcia's disability discrimination claims brought against the City University of New York pursuant to New York’s Executive Law §296(4), the State’s Human Rights Law (HRL).The Appellate… [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 11:28 am
"Anyone would have a hard time arguing that people of Barre and the rest of the state wouldn't be better served by an expansion of sex offender registry," he said. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:25 am
Moreover, the Appeals Court said, the 2003 withdrawal states that its assessment of threats to the species' current range is not "dependent on full implementation" of the Conservation Agreement's management strategy. [read post]