Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 7,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2010, 8:19 pm
I’ll discuss the precise legal objections advanced by Shanley’s appeal, and the SJC’s reasoning, in my next post. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 4:38 am
Take this scenario: parties agree that one gets Y unless x happens. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 1:08 pm
I am sitting in the airport and just saw a re-run of his latest comment - that if NBC wants to make sure he is not seen on TV for three years, they should just leave him on NBC.If in fact there's something to what Chris says, and I must admit it does have a ring of truth, it no doubt will manifest itself in ways that will end up on employment lawyers' desks all across the country, where unfortunately it won't be all that funny. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:15 pm
Eligible contract participant The term “eligible contract participant” means— (A) acting for its own account— (i) a financial institution; (ii) an insurance company that is regulated by a State, or that is regulated by a foreign government and is subject to comparable regulation as determined by the Commission, including a regulated subsidiary or affiliate of such an insurance company; (iii) an investment company subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act… [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
I. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 12:00 am
I had all sorts of x-rays and finally a CT scan before pleural plaques was confirmed. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 9:13 am
Here is the scenario in every visitation case I have tried - defending or pursuing:Attorney: You were to have visitation on X date? [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:01 am
McIntosh: what he does would never go down well with corporate. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 10:28 pm
Does an author have the right to do this? [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:57 pm
Does the administration view such searches as a reasonable means of carrying out airport security? [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:23 pm
Is Jane Doe really wearing a chainmail bra? [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 11:57 am
I have referenced healthcare informatics guru Renato M.E. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 11:12 am
How does this analogy apply to cable TV? [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 9:53 am
Oh, that old formulation – ‘not all X are bad, but they are popular with bad people’. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:19 am
These criteria include: the instrument is subordinated to depositors, general creditors and subordinated debt of the bank; the instrument is perpetual, with no maturity date and no incentives to redeem; the instrument may be redeemable at the option of the issuer only after a minimum of five years, and any optional redemption (i) is subject to prior supervisory approval and (ii) may occur only if the bank either (x) replaces the called instrument with capital of the same or better… [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:01 am
And this is based on information that does not include all of the legislators’ assets. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 3:40 am
Does this mean that the TSA got the message that it can do anything, anything at all, and we'll just happily comply? [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:21 pm
Previously I discussed In re Skvorecz (here), where the Federal Circuit interpreted "each wire leg having X" to mean "every wire leg having X". [read post]
Tenenbaum seeks reduction in jury's award against him; argues $675,000 verdict violates constitution
4 Jan 2010, 12:15 pm
Can I trust when they say that Williams, or Gore, stands for X? [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 5:39 am
" I think this is obviously a step in the right direction -- among other things, it incorporates elements of the Ellis Rule and the Kimmelman Rule, which are good things -- but, having conceded, as Dobrzynski does, that our museums hold more works than they can display and that they "are allowed to cull their collections" for purpose x ("to raise money to buy more art'), I would permit the same culling for purposes y and z, without making… [read post]
