Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 6201 - 6220 of 12,444
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2016, 4:52 am
The SI provides a new subsection, s. 77(10), which states that s. 77(1) does not apply to unitary patents. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer’s legal and management consulting work throughout her 27 plus year career has focused on helping organizations and their management use the law and process to manage people, process, compliance, operations and risk. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:49 am by Kelly Buchanan
The NDL does not examine the content of any material before accepting it for deposit and paying compensation to the publisher. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 2:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent No.7,664,516 (the ’516 patent); claims 7–16 and 23–27 of U.S.Patent No. 8,155,679; claims 1–5 of U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:31 am by Joy Waltemath
On September 27, the union told the employer it was not able to accept the defined-contribution pension plan the employer demanded. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 10:44 am by Dean Freeman
Gaetz’s bill does not require uninsured motorist coverage to for ride-sharing drivers, whereas Simmons’ bill does. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:22 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The commissioner held a public hearing on the proposed rule on September 27, 2000, under Docket No. 2460. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:05 am
While laudable, this entry point clouds an assessment of where the legal system is moving because it neglects the fundamental role of the political power organizing it: the CCP.The legal system does not operate in a vacuum. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 8:18 am by Robichaud
Of that group, the women lawyers (over the age of 50) made up only 27% of all women lawyers in the Province; compared with 51% of male lawyers in the same age bracket (over 50). [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:22 am by Michael Geist
EFF argues that the change has enormous implications: What does this surreptitious change from “paragraph” to “subparagraph” mean? [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
Unlike the limitations and exceptions provisions, this is not a limitation or exception as it does not envision the possibility of permitting a user to circumvent a digital lock. [read post]