Search for: "Fair v. State"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 27,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2014, 9:30 am
Via Al Brophy at the Faculty Lounge, we have word of a recently published essay by John V. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 10:09 am
Recently, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) heard a case, Golchin v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Armbruster v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:08 pm
In State of Tennessee v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Further, said the court, substantial evidence in the record supports the Commissioner's determination that the charges were substantiated by a fair preponderance of the evidence presented at the hearing. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm
In Batson v Kentucky , the U.S. .Supreme Court required the lawyers to state on the record a non-discriminatory reason why a juror was excused on the basis of race. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
An attorney representing an individual in an administrative hearing may be disqualified where such representation could result in an actual or apparent “conflict of interest”Tartakoff v New York State Educ. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:06 am
The Court of Appeals holds that employees who were not entitled to certain overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act can still get that overtime under the New York Labor Law.The case is Hayward v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:37 am
Plaintiff also raises a state law discrimination claim. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 6:09 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:41 am
State Agencies § 38a-790-8 (2). [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 9:19 am
In Doe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
The majority concluded:the authorities of the respondent State struck a fair balance between the applicants’ interest in free speech, on the one hand, and M.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:46 am
Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 83 (30 June 2011) Appeal from: Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 723 See also: Innovation Patents Flop Like Stunned Mullet Infringement – claim construction – functional claim – whether ‘includes a pivotally moveable floor’ encompasses a mechanism in which this element is insufficient to perform a claimed function – meaning of ‘to allow’ … [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 7:00 am
The Appellate Division, citing Ryan v New York Tel. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 8:38 am
Maatman, Jr. and Rebecca Bjork On January 7, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in Standard Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 5:24 am
Supreme Court has handed down a decision in EMD Sales Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 10:44 am
We previously reported on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 12:22 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
In Kerala Financial Corpn. v. [read post]
