Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 6201 - 6220 of 119,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am by Andree Blumstein
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 may prove to be telling. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:52 am
Vindicating an employee's right conferred by law may not be resolved by filing a grievance pursuant to a collective bargaining agreementMarino v Hauppauge UFSD, 262 AD2d 321If a public employee claims that some action by his or her employer violated his or her statutory rights, may the employer insist that the issue be resolved by the employee filing a grievance under a Taylor Law contract grievance procedure? [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:46 am by Michael DelSignore
Yet another Fourth Amendment case in pending before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Knights v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:30 pm
The Supreme Court has posted its statement of the issue on review in County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the  standard of proof required to support an administrative… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the  standard of proof required to support an administrative… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the  standard of proof required to support an administrative… [read post]