Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 6201 - 6220
of 21,155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
The First Department held otherwise in its March 19, 2015 decision in Buckingham v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 2:49 pm
” FTC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 1:01 am
But, in view of PanOptis' decision to sue Huawei on its U.S. patents in a U.S. court, and in view of the very minor share of Huawei's sales in the U.S., and that Huawei has clearly stated its willingness to agree to and desire for a FRAND license covering its US sales, FRAND requires that PanOptis offer Huawei a U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
[27] One main factor of consideration is whether or not the foreign manufacturer has assigned United States trademark rights and their registration to the designated exclusive United States importer.[28] United States and international antitrust and free competition policies intersect with trademark law in that the designated United States importer is usually concerned with gray market goods because they are sold for less, undercutting the designated United… [read post]
20 May 2017, 11:26 am
Sales & Consulting Corp. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 8:04 am
Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday in the case of Allen v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:08 am
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:36 pm
Fifty years ago, in a landmark judgment (New York Times v Sullivan), the United States Supreme Court constitutionalised defamation law. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:40 pm
In Cellular Sales of Missouri, LLC v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 7:02 am
The domicile of the parties also did not favor one state over the other since Stryker was based in Michigan, and the sales rep was domiciled in Louisiana. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:48 pm
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:16 am
Delaware Valley Floral Group v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am
In that case, the Court will consider the constitutionality of a California law banning the sale of violent video games to minors. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
In Federal Energy Regulatory Comm’n v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 12:58 pm
This reversal also necessarily invalidates the County's sale of the parcel to Tew. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
Wayfair, in which the justices will reconsider a ruling that limits the ability of state governments to require out-of-state online retailers to collect tax on sales to state residents, arguing that “[i]f states can directly compel people who live outside state boundaries to adhere to state standards—standards the people had no chance to influence—the concept of statehood itself is undermined. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 9:27 am
388/01 Commission v Italy, paragraph 14; Case C? [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:03 am
The state requires taxpayer self-reporting because the Supreme Court held, in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
