Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 6201 - 6220 of 16,393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2017, 3:15 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Kindred Nursing Centers v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Article 15 is a strong candidate for the most significant piece of internet law in the UK and continental Europe. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm by Richard Pildes
Thus, race-based districting absent a strong basis for concluding that the VRA requires it violates the Constitution. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
  Article 15 is a strong candidate for the most significant piece of internet law in the UK and continental Europe. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Graham Smith
  Article 15 is a strong candidate for the most significant piece of internet law in the UK and continental Europe. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:32 pm by Lawfare Editors
  In addressing the third paradigm—positive versus negative rights—I contended that although the theoretical arguments for positive human rights to fulfillment are very strong, there are practical reasons for moderating them with respect to states that have not achieved the basic conditions necessary for the fulfillment of negative rights. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am by Victoria Kwan
The next day, he discussed the Constitution and Brown v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:13 am by Helen Klein Murillo
As Quinta and I explained: Under United States v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Colorado, in which the justices held that a state cannot require a defendant whose conviction is invalidated to prove actual innocence before recovering fines and fees imposed as a consequence of the conviction, observing that with this decision, the “presumption of innocence, already strong in our criminal justice system, became a little stronger. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, 16-833, which the court denied, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:36 am by Florian Mueller
One doesn't even need to be wealthy to withhold payments in whole or in part (though it obviously makes it easier to deal with litigation costs and risks).In Apple v. [read post]