Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 6201 - 6220 of 14,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2019, 12:56 pm by Carrie Thompson
The indictment concerns Veselnitskaya’s involvement in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
” The Chapter 51 treatment of “accidental” infectious diseases is closely related to the § 43.05 discussion of COVID-19. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
Tough questions greeted counsel for both sides of this case—a seemingly mundane dispute about playgrounds and tire scraps that has potentially wide-ranging implications for the contours of religious liberty in the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:23 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Others much more qualified than I have analyzed the debate, so see these folks for much meatier, more lawyerly analyses:Orin Kerr, Volokh Conspiracy: "Reflections on the Oral Argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Doing so would let the state close, conservatively, 12 to 20 of its 112 prison units over the same period, saving hundreds of millions of dollars per year. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
In a 1966 decision, in a Hawaii state legislative redistricting case, Burns v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
The approach outlined here does not undermine Skoien, 614 F.3d at 639-43, or United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
Galang, supra.The Court of Appeals begins the opinion, as courts usually do, by explaining how, and why, the prosecution arose:In 2004, the female victim came to the United States from the Philippines. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
Costco, for the proposition that the first sale doctrine (§ 109(a)) "does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States unless they were previously imported and sold in the United States with the copyright holder's permission. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:55 am
United States, 914 A.2d 1 (D.C. 2006) (discussed here), which analyzes  blank">Crawford v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:47 am by Robert Tanha
Altman's vulnerable medical state and age meant that her chances for reemployment into a comparable position were very low, and justified an extended period of notice. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
The Supreme Court has even stated as much in its 1985 decision in Heckler v. [read post]