Search for: "COOPER v. STATE"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 7,425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2015, 6:08 am
Yet, collaboration gave us the Supreme Court’s opinion in Buck v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:24 am
" In Graham v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360) Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango) Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 10:00 pm
(citing Spainhower v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:37 pm
The Digital Regulation Cooperation Forum strengthens existing collaboration and coordination between the three regulators. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
Case citation: Munroe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Anjani Kumar Goenka & Anr (IP Frontline) Hollywood v Bollywood v Tollywood: When is ‘plagiarism’ equal to ‘copyright infringement’? [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:23 pm
Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 5:57 am
This ruling, from Georgia v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 9:30 pm
It thus seems a stretch to say that her conduct in speaking with and cooperating with the officers (however much in error) is atrributable to the state. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:59 pm
Cooper v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 8:31 pm
Seilkop v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:18 am
In any case, having an agency such as the IABS would hand states parties a tool and an opportunity to be seized by the matter without having to set up a lengthy preparatory process for consultations under BTWC Article V. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
See Till v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
