Search for: "D. O. B."
Results 6221 - 6240
of 7,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2016, 7:44 am
This might be important b/c if you put it in category (2), order w/o law, you get presumptive benefits of that category—superiority to judicial proceedings in some cases—when they aren’t warranted. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Strength has drawn the attention of people who’d really like to be able to sue an intermediary for a harm caused by a third party. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:59 am
., 2015 WL 4572296, No. 14-11818 (D. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am
Every text is multivocal; for feminists, this invites exploration and activating of the unvoiced, exiled world of women (Mary O’Connor). [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:47 pm
In a letter submitted pursuant to Rule 2:5-1(b), the trial court explained that the FRO was warranted because "[d]efendant committed the act of harassment and is likely to harass the [p]laintiff in the future. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
Other appointees include: Beryl Snyder John B. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:18 am
Code § 53(b). [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:35 pm
The court then explains that[o]ur analysis turns on the proper interpretation of OCGA § 16–9–93 (g) (1), which authorizes a civil remedy for violations of the GCSPA, and states:`Any person whose property or person is injured by reason of a violation of any provision of [the GCSPA] may sue therefor and recover for any damages sustained and the costs of suit. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
After procedural history not relevant here, in September 2016, the Town and Village jointly moved to dismiss each proceeding "for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to [DCH]'s failure to satisfy a condition precedent for challenging the assessments"—namely "[t]he failure of the [o]wner to submit [the] RP-524 [c]omplaints. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
After procedural history not relevant here, in September 2016, the Town and Village jointly moved to dismiss each proceeding "for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to [DCH]'s failure to satisfy a condition precedent for challenging the assessments"—namely "[t]he failure of the [o]wner to submit [the] RP-524 [c]omplaints. [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:45 pm
B 512). [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 6:52 am
Young, supra.The opinion goes on to explain that [o]n or about May 9, 2014, Mr. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:26 am
In a footnote, the judge explains that “[b]ecause of the underlying criminal investigation, portions of the record, including the target’s identity, are sealed. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
AUTHOR Klein, Lilian B. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(Ars Technica) CAFC: Co-inventors contribution must be 'more than the exercise of ordinary skill'; NTP awarded attorneys' fees: Oren Tavory v NTP (Patently-O) (Law360) (Law360) (Property, intangible) (Patent Prospector) (Property, intangible) PTO announces no IDS or Markush Rules during Bush Administration (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (Patently-O) (Patent Docs) Global Global - General Exploding the intangible asset market cap myth (IP Think Tank) … [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:45 pm
Delaware: On March 30th, Governor John Carney issued the Eighth Modification of the Declaration of a State of Emergency for the State of Delaware, clarifying that “[n]o provision contained in [the Sixth] Order shall be construed as relieving any policyholder of the obligation to pay premium payments due an insured or to comply with other obligations that a policyholder may have pursuant to a covered insurance policy. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
Colleen Chien: Government's brief will dictate Bilski result (PatLit) Terminal disclaimers and PTO: Proposal for a test case (Patently-O) Submitting positive decisions to the world patent offices (Patently-O) Chicago-centric team USA wins 2010 patent cup regatta (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Patent marking trolls knocked down but not out: Pequignot v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:15 pm
La juez BELLOTA GUZMÁN J.A. ha distorsionado el concepto de matrimonio y me remito al artículo 234° del C.C. y en el colmo de la incompetencia SUGIERE que entable un proceso AJENO al de Alimentos para que en dicha litis se resuelva -medio de prueba por medio- que mi esposa EN ESTOS MOMENTOS, NO ESTÁ CAPACITADA PARA ENTENDER que la Pensión de Alimentos es PARA NUESTRA SUBSISTENCIA, que no es su DINERO y que NO puede hacer con él lo que desee, como… [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
See, e.g., Christopher B. [read post]
