Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 11,203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2014, 2:48 pm
., 778 So. 2d 888, 891-2 (Fla. 2000) (quoting Fine v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:18 am
The decision in Burrage v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 7:41 am
Details of how to make submissions are available on the website of the parties' respective representatives; Ohno & Partners are acting for Samsung (see announcement here, in Japanese) and Ito & Mitomi/Morrison & Foerster are acting for Apple (see announcement, here, in Japanese and English). [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:24 am
It is an ordinary English word and should be construed as such. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:24 am
It is an ordinary English word and should be construed as such. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am
In it he discusses Robert Belton's The Crusade for Equality in the Workplace: The Griggs v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:59 pm
Medtronic CoreValve, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:22 pm
Challinor, The Decision of the English High Court in Rogers & Anor v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 5:31 pm
And while, as noted above, many English-speaking countries have legalized same-sex marriage, some, such as Australia, have not. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 1:46 pm
This week’s decision from the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Ghavim v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 1:24 pm
So asks a commenter in the recent thread about the Mann v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:03 am
Contract law: Consider Campbell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 1:05 pm
Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:45 am
The English political fights that led to such celebrated (at least in the colonies) landmark common law cases as Entickand Wilkes v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:17 am
The appellant started proceedings in England against the respondent, including a claim for damages, arguing that the quantification of damages recoverable from the respondent is governed entirely by English law, and, in particular, by provisions of the Fatal Accidents Act 1976. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 10:04 am
The style of the case is, Prudential Insurance v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:51 am
Because of an ACLU victory in Rodriguez v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
Mr Bleuse, a German national who worked for a UK company throughout Europe (but not in the UK) under an English law contract, was unable to bring claims for unfair dismissal or unlawful deduction of wages because he could not satisfy the tests set out in Lawson v Serco – that is to say his employment did not have sufficient connection to the UK; his English law contract was not enough for these purposes. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:01 pm
Google then sought to have that service nullified, by seeking an order declaring that the English court has no jurisdiction to try these particular claims (i.e. it was not saying that it could never be sued in the English courts). [read post]
