Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 6221 - 6240
of 21,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2018, 2:54 am
WHB Licensing, LP v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:02 am
Oregon Brewing Company, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, No. 16-3602, 27 July 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 7:57 pm
The Utah Supreme Court has issued its decision in the case Haik v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 1:03 pm
Lomax v Gosport Borough Council (2018) EWCA Civ 1846 This was a second appeal on a homeless application by Ms L to Gosport. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:00 pm
This year marks the 20th anniversary of the other decision, Oncale v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:30 am
MCA Records, Inc.), a hip hop record label (20th Century Fox Television v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
As one court recently summarized: Virtually no court has held that, on its own, a defendant’s purchase of a plaintiff’s mark as a keyword term is sufficient for liability. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm
In Kahl v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 4:42 am
However, at some point various splits became more marked, and nowadays it would be impossible to bring together all of the online political tendencies. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 1:16 am
The court considers that, as discussed in the TOP Logistics case "…any act by a third party preventing the proprietor of a registered trade mark in one or more Member States from exercising his right to control the first placing of goods bearing that mark on the market in the EEA, by its very nature undermines that essential function of the trade mark" (emphasis added). [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 1:16 am
The court considers that, as discussed in the TOP Logistics case "…any act by a third party preventing the proprietor of a registered trade mark in one or more Member States from exercising his right to control the first placing of goods bearing that mark on the market in the EEA, by its very nature undermines that essential function of the trade mark" (emphasis added). [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:43 am
Davis and Helvering v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
Gender Inequality in 21st Century Britain: Using litigation as a tool Direct Sex Discrimination and Disadvantage to women: R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40 Introduction: Does Law Have a Gender? [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:55 am
The Board goes on to state another common rule: the first term in a mark is more likely to be remembered by the average consumer. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:10 am
Regulation Best Interest v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
As far as acquired distinctiveness was concerned, although the EASY family of trade marks had acquired distinctiveness in Member States where English is spoken or commonly used, the threshold for distinctiveness was set very high and the "EASY" trade mark had not acquired distinctiveness on its own.2. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:21 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:05 am
Reiter & Walsh ABC Law Centers is based in Michigan, but we handle cases throughout the United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 2:57 pm
” Sharkey v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:31 am
T.A.B. v. [read post]
