Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"*If a regulation controlled, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Wolff v Hodson, 285 N.Y. 197, said that the decision was within the sole power and jurisdiction of the administrative agency and thus no appointee who has obtained permanent appointed to his or her position can be removed without being afforded the procedural rights set forth in §50.4 of the Civil Service Law, "despite the fact that had his [or her] infirmity to qualify for the position been… [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:39 am
Take what I say with a grain of salt - I think Rite Hite v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:40 am
But perhaps this case will lead more people on the left to rethink their traditionally negative view of constitutional limits on federal power. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"*If a regulation controlled, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Wolff v Hodson, 285 N.Y. 197, said that the decision was within the sole power and jurisdiction of the administrative agency and thus no appointee who has obtained permanent appointed to his or her position can be removed without being afforded the procedural rights set forth in §50.4 of the Civil Service Law, "despite the fact that had his [or her] infirmity to qualify for the position been… [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 8:15 am
To see what we mean, one need only look to United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:53 am
Contemporary conservative movements may seem immensely powerful and completely intransigent to most liberals. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:26 am
IMS Health, or Harris v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:27 am
This program is limited to 15 people. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 12:51 pm
As Marbury v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:25 pm
Like other sanctuary cases currently in the federal courts, United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 11:15 am
In Brandenburg v. [read post]
5 May 2025, 4:00 am
In 1954, the Supreme Court famously decided Brown v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:52 am
In the 2005 Gonzales v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 2:46 am
The 10th Amendment reads that, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
Holder and Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 11:53 am
People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 12:32 pm
App, 1973); People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:15 pm
From Richard v. [read post]
16 Feb 2025, 9:56 am
Its decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
