Search for: "STEVENS v. THE STATE" Results 6221 - 6240 of 7,830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the fact that the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion two weeks ago in the Wisconsin election case, Republican National Committee (RNC) v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 10:03 am by Jeff Gamso
  In fact, the Supreme Court held, in Mills v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 7:56 am by Brad Schnure
” We are compelled to remind you of the New Jersey Supreme Court’s ruling in Lance v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 4:33 pm by Steve Kalar
It can be in the Ninth, thanks to a very disappointing decision in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 5:14 am
More recently, in McCreary County v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 2:46 am
Renneisen, Deputy Attorney General; Steven R. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
  He focuses on Justice Stevens' and Scalia's dissents in the dismissal of the certified question in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and McConnell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
Steven Lore and Jet Products and Services, Inc (TTABlog) Sterling Mets [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:25 am by Josh Blackman
A marshal protecting Justice Steven Field killed a man in defense of the justice. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am by Stephen Wermiel
Justice John Paul Stevens, who left the Court in 2010, said after he retired that he regretted his vote in 1976 to uphold seemingly fair, new procedures for the death penalty in Gregg v. [read post]