Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 10,226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2013, 8:24 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Social media behemoth Facebook and an Oregon ad agency have been sued for copyright infringement [17 U.S.C. sec. 101 et seq.] in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by the company that licenses and manages the music of 40-year-old rapper/songwriter Eminem (Marshall Bruce Mathers III).In the Complaint filed May 20, Eight Mile Style, LLC & Martin Affiliated LLC v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
— Mark A. [read post]
21 May 2013, 10:24 am
(quotation marks and citations omitted). [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
In Metrish v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:56 am
See Acme United Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:23 am
The nongovernmental organisations which are signatories to the Joint Memorandum of Understanding on Fire and Building Safety (dated March 15, 2012), having stated their intention to support the implementation of this programme, shall, at their own election, be signed witnesses to this Agreement. [read post]
19 May 2013, 11:14 am
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:39 pm
IRS Abuses Power in Targeting Tea Party The extraordinary revelation this week that the Internal Revenue Service targeted tea party groups for more aggressive enforcement highlights exactly why caution is needed in any response to the much-vilified Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Redpath, and Owen Mark Williams Case number: 10-cv-03995 (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota)Case filed: September 21, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 15, 2013 5/17/2013 8/15/2013 2013-40 SEC v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:25 am
Namely, bingo games and operations have been granted legitimacy throughout the state - provided they meet a strict criteria of of six guidelines, per the 2009 Alabama Supreme Court decision in Barber v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:00 pm
Namely, bingo games and operations have been granted legitimacy throughout the state – provided they meet a strict criteria of of six guidelines, per the 2009 Alabama Supreme Court decision in Barber v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:08 pm
Unfortunately, the consensus of United States legal authority on what is generic rather than descriptive, and vice-versa, has become somewhat discordant. . . . [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 8:00 am
Petersen v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
However, the European Commission's preliminary assessment is that the license agreement underlying that rate-setting case came into being under anticompetitive circumstances, calling into question whether there even is an enforceable agreement in place.Alternatively to a process in Germany, Google "suggest[ed] the [arbitration] panel [in the United States] employ a 'baseball arbitration' procedure to resolve any areas in which the parties are unable to reach agreement" (emphasis… [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:39 am
Sure, Nazaire is trying to make a point that the decisions of a United States District Judge in one state do not dictate the decisions of a United States District Judge in another state. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:12 am
Only in 2008, Koh made the following remarks in testimony before a Senate subcommittee: the Bush Administration has consistently asserted a constitutional theory of unfettered executive power, based on extraordinarily broad interpretations of Article II’s “Commander-in-Chief” Clause and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
One of the central policy issues injected into the current case of AMP v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm
For example, recent United States Supreme Court decisions have imposed significant limitations on the ability of public officials and public figures to win defamation actions. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm
Sanders argues that the Milward opinion is important because it highlights what he characterizes as a “rhetorical conflict that has been ongoing, often below the surface, since the United States Supreme Court’s 1993 opinion in Daubert v. [read post]
