Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2008, 2:41 am
Just two days before the final incident, she had also spoken with a medical employee, who noted the conversation in her file but took no steps to report the matter to authorities, because "I don't want to get him into trouble. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:05 am
The employee didn't raise any alarms. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:42 pm
(emphasis added).For reasons we can’t explain, this issue tended to come up first in litigation against the government concerning vaccines. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 11:55 am
Small Claimants have to "prepare arguments" and take time from work to show up in court, don't you know? [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 11:55 am
Small Claimants have to "prepare arguments" and take time from work to show up in court, don't you know? [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm
I don’t wish to rehearse these arguments here, but I do know the judicial reasoning was the primary circumstantial evidence that persuaded many of my colleagues. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am
Thus, it’s “plausible that Defendants had ‘a continuous business relationship’ with traffickers and Plaintiff’s ex-boyfriend, and that Defendants and traffickers ‘have established a pattern of conduct or could be said to have a tacit agreement.'” Benefit from the venture. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:53 am
The issue is that MedEvacs cannot have guns, but they get attacked, so they don't fly until an escort (eg, Apache) arrives. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 10:21 am
The federal judge didn't buy Youssef's argument:[T]he October, 2007, revocation of consent . . . does not require suppression of the internet history. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 11:57 am
From today's decision by Judge Angel Kelley (D. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:27 am
It's the defendants that are making the requests. [read post]
25 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm
Tenth Circuit (unpublished): Maybe, maybe not, but we don't have jurisdiction to decide that before a final judgment because sovereign immunity is too closely tied up with the merits. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:16 pm
And the authorities generally don’t bother giving you a sample unless they already suspect there’s reason to expect a match. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 1:38 pm
Since they don’t calculate the cost of “patenting around” existing patents, their calculations of cost are likely on the restrained side. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
(Or ‘Maybe the recession’s worse than we think! [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 1:29 pm
And there is some reason to fear that some justices don't share the burgeoning sense that the machinery of death in this country is broken. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:44 am
Well, we don't want it in their language, your Honor. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 8:50 am
" THERE ARE LINES you don't cross. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:26 am
Go back and read it again -- it works better to undersell it, don't you think? [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:26 am
Go back and read it again -- it works better to undersell it, don't you think? [read post]
